ipad screen protector-2011 new
From an interview with Fox News’s Neil iPad case
Cavuto:
Cavuto: I want to ask you, how much are you making on that? Because it’s $0.99, but typically, typically Apple takes a third.
Murdoch: That’s correct.
Cavuto: Now, is it taking a third here?
Murdoch: At least the first year, yes. We’ll be getting $0.70.
Cavuto: All right. But it goes — so you say at least the first year. It goes down after that?
Murdoch: We — no. Up, we hope. ipad screen protector
Cavuto: But down for Apple.
Murdoch: That’s subject to negotiation.
That surprises me. I really thought the “other shoe” that’s about to drop regarding subscription pricing (and in-app purchasing for apps like Kindle) is that Apple would be taking a smaller cut, more in line with being a payment processor than a ip camera store owner. The bottom line for why The Daily is major news is not that it’s particularly good (at least yet), but simply that News Corp. is willing to place a decent-sized bet on a publication that is only available on the iPad.
And Murdoch on Steve Jobs:
Here we have the man who invented the personal computer, then the laptop. He’s now destroying them. That is an amazing life.
55 people liked thisLong, detailed post by Microsoft’s Dean Hachamovitch on HTML5, H.264, and WebM. It’s a cogent take, with pointed questions for Google (and other proponents of WebM/VP8):
Offers of “free” or “royalty-free” electronic cigarette source code and strong assertions that the technology is “not patent encumbered” don’t help when a patent holder files a complaint that your video, your site, or your product infringes on her intellectual property. The only true arbiter of infringement, once it’s asserted, is a court of law. Asserting openness is not a legal defense. Whether one supports open technology or not, there are practical liability issues today that need to be examined. These issues motivate different potential approaches to risk protection. One path is indemnification. For example, will Google indemnify Mozilla, a PC OEM, a school, a Web site, a chip manufacturer, a device company, or an individual for using WebM? Will they indemnify Apple? Microsoft? Will they indemnify any or all of these parties worldwide? If Google were truly confident that the technology does not infringe and is not encumbered by patents whatsoever, wouldn’t this LED Watch indemnification be easy?
Related posts:
https://testedstoreroom.multiply.com/
https://testedstoreroom.posterous.com/
https://testedstoreroom.blogspot.com
https://lemixy.livejournal.com/